News Preview/Discussion - WW3RP: STASILAND

[Deleted member 5658]

Sounds cool

 

[STUCK IN A CAKE]

 

[Tinbe]

Okay, time to actually ask something.
With the theme being so heavily about combat (as opposed to HL2RP's more 'serene' atmosphere), how will you ensure that S2K doesn't take people's priority? Sure, it's not the same WW3RP as before, but by the sounds of things, it won't be exactly a "calm" place like HL2RP.

 

[Deerjohn]

 

[afric]

 

[Powley]

 

[Deerjohn]

*blocks your path*

 

[STUCK IN A CAKE]

*blocks your path*

go around it

what is it gonna do? Turn?

 

[andrei ulmeyda]

 

[Isuckatgaming]

trotsky watch out the assassin is coming

oh god oh fuck he's got his AirPods on he can't hear shit

 

[Deleted member 61]

a personal pitch from me if not already done - please restrict female characters to civilian life only. it didn't make sense IC to have mixed soviet regiments with males and females together. yes, women served in the soviet armed forces/red army but in their own divisions i.e the night witches and more commonly known sniper companies

the OOC aspect of 'cutie' femchars all trained in taekwondo while having the physique of a stick insect was irritating, tacky, and released metaphorical toxins into the wartime atmosphere

Certainly not.

Women should be able to participate in Soviet matters, whether they be undercover working for the KGB/Stasi, or in logistics within the garrison.

Perhaps, if it were NATO, it would make more sense to restrict gender, but considering the Soviet Union is a 'equitable employer', I don't see the issue. If we catch people wasting the Union's time and just hold hands rping, it can be taken IC.

 

[afric]

Certainly not.

Women should be able to participate in Soviet matters, whether they be undercover working for the KGB/Stasi, or in logistics within the garrison.

Perhaps, if it were NATO, it would make more sense to restrict gender, but considering the Soviet Union is a 'equitable employer', I don't see the issue. If we catch people wasting the Union's time and just hold hands rping, it can be taken IC.

it makes more sense if the reverse was true

the SOE employed women often and, today, 50% of MI6 and MI5 are women

 

[Deleted member 61]

it makes more sense if the reverse was true

the SOE employed women often and, today, 50% of MI6 and MI5 are women

Today, not 1990.

 

[Oxy[Morons]]

it makes more sense if the reverse was true

the SOE employed women often and, today, 50% of MI6 and MI5 are women

WRONG
the Soviet Union was the largest equal opportunity employer the world has ever known
fact

 

[afric]

Today, not 1990.

the same was very true during the height of the cold war

the millenial era (2000-2019) has resulted in very little change

not one to argue and jump about over a little thing but surely with every man doing his duty women's call to arms in the more subtle things is needed

 

[Deleted member 61]

the same was very true during the height of the cold war

the millenial era (2000-2019) has resulted in very little change

not one to argue and jump about over a little thing but surely with every man doing his duty women's call to arms in the more subtle things is needed

Frankly, when I first wrote that, I had written leadership (as in Major+) knowing there were women. You're right its' not worth arguing over, and everyone would be doing their part in any way possible.

I'll concede, considering its' not like I can prove I actually had written leadership in the first place.

 

[afric]

Frankly, when I first wrote that, I had written leadership (as in Major+) knowing there were women. You're right its' not worth arguing over, and everyone would be doing their part in any way possible.

I'll concede, considering its' not like I can prove I actually had written leadership in the first place.

oh yeah leadership for sure but i dont think it's worth the arguement to ban them at low levels

 

[Oxy[Morons]]

An actual solution would probably be stricter enforcement for height and weight, maybe a 5'8 height limit to prevent the super short uwu femchars that would be discharged due to how short they are, and probably frame limits so they're not 120 lbs and thin as a stick. And probably stricter uniform standards such as certain hairstyles, along with stuff about personal behavior and fraternization so you can prevent Lieutenants from climbing all up and down enlisted and other officers dicks, or excusing their shitty whiny behavior and how they threaten to shoot people with 'that's just my characters personality, deal with it.'



Ah, I remember Prazak...

Should of put her in the fukkin gulag along with Pupienescu.

just an FYI there’s people as low as 5’2” in the military

honestly so much I thought I had figured because of my investment in the server is now completely wrong

especially the mindset of “a REAL soldier wouldn’t be that retarded IRL you minge”
boy was that sentiment wrong 90% of the time

 

[Roosebud]

also stop confusing this with the shitpost thread, it's gonna be 1000% harder for me to collect stuff for the QA and answer questions on the go when I have to wade through tons upon tons of irrelevant crap

 

[Husky]

Quick question @Roosebud, any idea when the forums side of things will be open?