Appetite Ruining Kebab
Molecule
- Joined
- May 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,557
- Nebulae
- 19,716
These are not warnings following actions, these describe a situation moving into a map or territory. Or at minimum they arent the way I suggest them if we were to ever redo a similair system.
"You've been sweeping a lot recently with significant loss, we're losing the ability to keep this supplied. We recommend you try to be defensive for the next week otherwise we'll be limited in what you can be supplied with"
im pretty sure something of this kind was consistently communicated IC and OOC in some manner, i know i frequently spoke to faction leaders about it so at the very least they could pass it down and make it policy
beyond that, if i have to strain myself to make everything as explicit as it reasonably can be (without outright spoonfeeding) , and its still not enough, maybe its just a matter of using your brain? maybe going to a different environment with a different premise that goes far as to limit your supplies means the setting is trying to tell you something
if you look at all that and go "we go again!!!" then that's the point where the problem is out of my hands
I refer to my sources and speaking, most of which I speak to often and find to be credible. If there is a continued disagreement by both sides regarding the nature of it perhaps it's not worth bringing up as an argument. Perhaps for the sake of clarity, you can provide which rank-leaders were informed as I'm working with a he-said-she-said basis outside of my own experience (which is not a RL experience).
and im not referring to you specifically in that last ime, but i am referring to some of those sources who actively took part in trying to undermine SC; some of them had their IC reasons, and those reasons were valid, but that doesn't mean they aren't accountable for ultimately impairing the line of communications between the city's leadership and civil protection (and losing combine by the battle by extension). that's not necessarily a 'bad' thing, it's a good story, but for these people to then go out of their way to blame the storytellers for adapting to their actions (giving you the thing you seek; impact - which isn't always in favor of you) is dishonest at best
Reactions:
List