Akula
Sangheili Bias
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2016
- Messages
- 5,443
- Nebulae
- 19,709
my boi gary johnson
Gary is a libertarian like the Queen of England is an independant
my boi gary johnson
you mean the idiot that didn't know what was happening in Syria?
Since 9/11, the U.S. has admitted 784,000 refugees into the country. According to the Migration Policy Institute, during that time, exactly three refugees were found to have links to terrorism — so, approximately .00038 percent of refugees in the U.S. have had ties to terrorism. Two of these refugees were caught while trying to leave the country to join extremist groups abroad. All three are currently in prison. Lavinia Limón, the president of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, told The Atlantic:
"I think I can count on one hand the number of crimes of any significance that I've heard have been committed by refugees. It just hasn't been an issue."
Not a single Trump supporter I've spoken to has realised in any way shape or form that refugees from the Middle East have been coming to the US since they started killing countless civilians in Iraq post 9/11. You also never stop to consider that despite speaking a different language and having a different set of Eastern based beliefs, that are in no way really /too/ disimilar to modern Christianity in many ways, that these human beings who live in fear of terrorism themselves, don't want a way to escape, a fresh start where a 7.62mm round isn't the only thing you can expect for breakfast in the morning.![]()
BUT KEK WILLS IT AM I RIGHT MY FELLOW MEMERS XDDDDDDD
On the other hand, we have white middle class suburban kids doing shit like this, then proceeding to shoot innocent people based on the color of their skin:
![]()
Now I'm not BLM, I have left wing leanings but none are towards Shillary in any way, Trump has some interesting ideas and I respect everyone's opinions, but at the same time for the people of America to blame all their problems on minorities simply because they are unable to come to terms with the fact that they're their own worst enemy is fucking stupid. As a US citizen I find it genuinely fucking retarded that none of you goons even attempt to look further in to how seeded 99% of 'terrorism' is, ever stop to wonder how pic related isn't considered a terrorist, yet the guy who did that non-fatal bombing is? It's not a crusade against Islam at all, in fact it's quite the opposite, it's fear control if anything, maybe a little slither of MK Ultra's still embedded in the CIA.
Regardless I'm finna sit by and watch you all fuck eachother up for laughs.
YOU'RE ALL THE HOMEGROWN TERRORISTS YOU'RE SO AFRAID OF AND IT'S FUCKING HILARIOUS
is he still alive?We all know who's going to win though.
![]()
is he still alive?
I thought he commited suicide or became a full time guac bowl salesman
Slow and steady wins the race dude.is he still alive?
I thought he commited suicide or became a full time guac bowl salesman
Slow and steady wins the race dude.
Pretty sure their leader was facing charges for vandalizing something.Green party. Honestly if they're ever going to win it be this one. Here's the funny bit usually you watch the green party because they'd be doing the crazy shit because they know they won't win.
All they gotta do this time is not that.
Pretty sure their leader was facing charges for vandalizing something.
>"I respect everyone's opinions"
>Mocks everyone who supports Trump.
I'm getting mixed signals. Idon'tgive a shit about refugees. And yes there are terrorists in refugees. That's not a question. We should've turned the middle East into a fucking parking lot post 9/11. Innocents dead? Yes. Far more than 3,000 ? Definitely. That's called sending a message. We either go in and completely lay waste and take their oil. We take a different approach and show the next generation that America isn't how they perceive us as. Or we leave them alone and completely cut off travel from the Middle East or run background checks on middle eastern people racial profiling or not it's been proven Islam is the leading 'reason' for bombings. ESPECIALLY AGAINST WESTERN CIVILIZATION OF WHICH WE'RE APART. There is no middle land where both sides can be made happy with compromise. (Remember Hitler when we gave him Czechoslovakia so he'd finally stop taking over countries?) Give them an inch and they demand a mile.
Also to the refugee problem. Look at Germany.
They can come over all they want but yet betterblearn english. Become a citizen. Pay taxes. And follow the rules or they can gtfo.
And to address your terrorist issue. The definition of terrorism is "the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims." Burning any type of flag, unless aimed to harm someone else, is protected by the US Constitution while planting several bombs is. You're comparing a nonviolent non-crime to a very violent terrorist act. https://theintercept.com/2015/07/22/department-justice-didnt-charge-dylan-roof-domestic-terrorism/ And I'm not referring to the shooting. I'm referring to the act of burning a flag. Please read that.
"Only 3 terrorists" Is 3 too many. The US has rules that must be followed. I don't care if they are non-violent. They are coming over here from a place of war without pursuing citizenship at all. They're abusing our systems just like they're abusing the systems in Germany and other parts of Europe.
As much as I can respect your opinion, it is pretty retarded in anyone's terms to view radical Islam as the only terrorist threat on US soil.
https://www.iraqbodycount.org/
"Let's get them back guys xdd", before you say anything, this includes US deaths, most of which were combatants.
Germany fucked themselves by not screening those they let in.
He had political aims though? Regardless the flag burning was literally just a reference picture of someone you could consider a homegrown terrorist.
Linked to terrorist organisation does not equal jihadist, get your facts right next time, the edgy "rapefugees" meme was a hard hitter, if only you'd had a picture that backed itself up with actual evidence, and links from non-biased news sources.
What are you talking about?
The only true god is the emperor!
![]()
>"I respect everyone's opinions"
>Mocks everyone who supports Trump.
I'm getting mixed signals. Idon'tgive a shit about refugees. And yes there are terrorists in refugees. That's not a question. We should've turned the middle East into a fucking parking lot post 9/11. Innocents dead? Yes. Far more than 3,000 ? Definitely. That's called sending a message. We either go in and completely lay waste and take their oil. We take a different approach and show the next generation that America isn't how they perceive us as. Or we leave them alone and completely cut off travel from the Middle East or run background checks on middle eastern people racial profiling or not it's been proven Islam is the leading 'reason' for bombings. ESPECIALLY AGAINST WESTERN CIVILIZATION OF WHICH WE'RE APART. There is no middle land where both sides can be made happy with compromise. (Remember Hitler when we gave him Czechoslovakia so he'd finally stop taking over countries?) Give them an inch and they demand a mile.
![]()
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/american-attacks.aspx
Also to the refugee problem. Look at Germany.
They can come over all they want but yet betterblearn english. Become a citizen. Pay taxes. And follow the rules or they can gtfo.
And to address your terrorist issue. The definition of terrorism is "the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims." Burning any type of flag, unless aimed to harm someone else, is protected by the US Constitution while planting several bombs is. You're comparing a nonviolent non-crime to a very violent terrorist act. https://theintercept.com/2015/07/22/department-justice-didnt-charge-dylan-roof-domestic-terrorism/ And I'm not referring to the shooting. I'm referring to the act of burning a flag. Please read that.
"Only 3 terrorists" Is 3 too many. The US has rules that must be followed. I don't care if they are non-violent. They are coming over here from a place of war without pursuing citizenship at all. They're abusing our systems just like they're abusing the systems in Germany and other parts of Europe.
![]()
"Look, there's only 3 of them. That means it's not a problem guys!!"
Nationalism isn't racist and globalism is retarded.
>Calling all refugees terrorists is bad guys, you're all fucking retards
>Calls all of america home grown terrorists
lol
EDIT #1000: I also just remembered this is a fast thread
they have to kill humans to be considered murderers :)Year Civilians killed as a result of insurgent actions Civilians killed as a result of U.S-led military actions Civilians killed as a result of the war
2001 n/a
2002 n/a
- The Project on Defense Alternatives estimated that in a 3-month period between October 7, 2001 and January 1, 2002, at least 1,000-1,300 civilians were directly killed by the U.S.-led aerial bombing campaign,[5] and that by mid-January 2002, at least 3,200 more Afghans had died of "starvation, exposure, associated illnesses, or injury sustained while in flight from war zones", as a result of war.[6]
- The Los Angeles Times found that in a 5-month period from October 7, 2001 to February 28, 2002, there were between 1,067 and 1,201 civilian deaths from the bombing campaign reported in U.S., British, and Pakistani newspapers and international wire services.[7]
- According to The Guardian, possibly as many as 20,000 Afghans died in 2001 as an indirect result of the initial U.S. airstrikes and ground invasion.[8]
- Professor Marc W. Herold of the University of New Hampshire estimated that in the 20-month period between October 7, 2001 and June 3, 2003, at least 3,100 to 3,600 civilians were directly killed by U.S.-led forces.[9]
2003 n/a
2004 n/a n/a n/a
2005 n/a
- Professor Marc W. Herold of the University of New Hampshire estimated at least 408-478 Afghan civilians were directly killed by U.S./NATO actions.[10]
2006
- direct civilian deaths: at least 408 to 478
- Human Rights Watch estimated at least 699 Afghan civilians were killed by various insurgent forces in 2006.[11]
- Human Rights Watch estimated at least 230 Afghan civilians were killed by US or NATO attacks in 2006: 116 by airstrikes and 114 by ground fire.[12]
- Professor Marc W. Herold of the University of New Hampshire estimated at least 653-769 Afghan civilians were directly killed by U.S./NATO actions.[10]
2007
- Human Rights Watch estimated at least 929 Afghan civilians were killed in fighting related to the armed conflict in 2006.[11] In all, they estimated more than 4,400 Afghans (civilians and militants) were killed in conflict-related violence in 2006, twice as many as in 2005.[13]
- An Associated Press tally based on reports from NATO, coalition, and Afghan officials, estimated 4,000 Afghans (civilians and militants) were killed in 2006.[13]
- The UN Assistance Mission Afghanistan (UNAMA) estimated that 700 Afghan civilians were killed by anti-government elements in 2007, accounting for 46% of the civilian casualties.[14][15]
- Human Rights Watch estimated that at least 950 Afghan civilians were killed by various insurgent forces in 2007.[11]
- Human Rights Watch estimated at least 434 Afghan civilians were killed by US or NATO attacks in 2007: 321 by airstrikes and 113 by ground fire. Another 57 civilians were killed in crossfire, and 192 died under unclear circumstances.[12]
- The UN Assistance Mission Afghanistan (UNAMA) estimated that 629 Afghan civilians were killed by international and Afghan forces in 2007, accounting for 41% of the civilian casualties.[14][15]
- Professor Marc W. Herold of the University of New Hampshire estimated at least 1,010-1,297 Afghan civilians were directly killed by U.S./NATO actions.[10]
2008
- The UN Assistance Mission Afghanistan (UNAMA) estimated that 1,523 Afghan civilians died as a direct result of armed conflict in 2007.[14][16]
- Human Rights Watch estimated at least 1,633 Afghan civilians were killed in fighting related to the armed conflict in 2007.[11]
- The Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) estimated that around 1,000 civilians were killed by militant groups in 2008.[17]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) reported that 1,160 Afghan civilians were killed by anti-government forces in 2008, accounting for 55% of the civilian deaths.[18][19]
- The Afghanistan Rights Monitor(ARM) estimated that over 2,300 civilians were killed by insurgents in 2008, including 930 in suicide bombings.[17][20]
- The Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) estimated that around 800 civilians were killed by U.S.-led military forces in 2008.[17]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) reported that 828 Afghan civilians had been killed by international-led military forces in 2008, accounting for 39% of the civilian deaths. Air-strikes accounted for the largest proportion of this number, 64%, with 552 civilians killed as a result of U.S./NATO airstrikes.[18][19]
- According to Afghanistan's ambassador to Australia, Amanullah Jayhoon, 1,000 Afghan civilians were killed by coalition forces in 2008.[21]
- The Afghanistan Rights Monitor(ARM) estimated that over 1,620 civilians were killed by U.S.-led military forces in 2008, including 680 killed in airstrikes. ARM also estimated that military operations by US-led NATO and coalition forces caused at least 2,800 injuries and displaced 80,000 people from their homes.[17][20]
- Professor Marc W. Herold of the University of New Hampshire estimated at least 864-1,017 Afghan civilians were directly killed by U.S./NATO foreign forces in 2008.[22]
2009
- The Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) estimated that around 1,800 civilians were killed as a result of the armed hostilities in 2008.[17]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) reported that 2,118 Afghan civilians wered killed as a direct result of armed conflict in 2008, the highest number since the end of the initial 2001 invasion.[16][18][19][23]
- The Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM) estimated that in 2008 around 3,917 civilians were killed, over 6,800 were wounded, and around 120,000 were forced out of their homes.[17][20]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) attributed 1,630 Afghan civilian deaths as having been caused by anti-government elements in 2009, representing two-thirds of the 2,412 Afghan civilian deaths it recorded in the American-led war in 2009.[24][25]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) attributed 596 Afghan civilian deaths as having been caused by international-led military forces in 2009, representing about a quarter of the 2,412 Afghan civilian deaths it recorded as having been caused by the war in 2009.[24][25]
2010
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) recorded 2,412 Afghan civilian deaths in the American-led war in 2009, representing a jump of 14% over the number killed in 2008. In 186 (8%) of the deaths, UNAMA was unable to clearly attribute the cause to any one side.[24][25]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) attributed 2,080 Afghan civilian deaths as having been caused by anti-government elements in 2010, up 28% from 2009 and representing 74.9% of the 2,777 Afghan civilian deaths they recorded in the American-led war in 2010.[26][27]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) attributed 440 Afghan civilian deaths as having been caused by U.S.-led military forces in 2010, down 26% from 2009 and representing 15.9% of the 2,777 Afghan civilian deaths they recorded in the American-led war in 2010.[26][27]
2011
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) recorded 2,777 Afghan civilian deaths in the American-led war in 2010, a jump of 15% over the number killed in 2009. In 9% of the deaths, UNAMA and AIHRC were unable to clearly attribute the cause to any one side.[26][27]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) attributed 1,167 Afghan civilian deaths as having been caused by anti-government elements in the first six months of 2011, up 28% from the same period in 2010 and representing 79.8% of the total 1,462 Afghan civilian deaths they recorded in the conflict during this period.[28]
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) attributed 207 Afghan civilian deaths as having been caused by U.S.-led military forces in the first six months of 2011, down 9% from the same period in 2010 and representing 14.2% of the 1,462 Afghan civilian deaths they recorded in the conflict during this period.[28]
Get your reactionary US Imperialism out of here.
- The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) recorded 1,462 Afghan civilian deaths in the American-led war in the first six months of 2011, a jump of 15% over the number killed in the same period in 2010. In 6% of the deaths, UNAMA and AIHRC were unable to clearly attribute the cause to any one side.
![]()