- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 17,433
- Nebulae
- 25,023
Sounds like a shit class to be honest.
Art should be fluid and brought about via inspiration, not because some dingo teacher who studied art in a university decided your art was shit or not.
Art tended to be judged by the masses or a certain social group, such as exotic paintings being sold to nobles while normal paintings / carvings might be sold to the common folk so if you weren't appealing to them then you weren't getting your art sold.
This, however, is centralized around the ego of one person (your teacher) and his perspective on art and whether he believes it is art or not.
I would never take a course like this with these types of obstacles in your way if it were me but to each is his own.
They don't judge Art on whether or not it looks good in GCSE or A levels.
That's just not fair on people that can't draw, etc.
It's based more on knowledge of techniques and terminology.
With photography, you should know what lens and field of view to use for a particular shot, along with colour correction, etc.
While the teacher may not like it personally, you still get a good mark for doing it correctly.
Reactions:
List