Twar
The truth is out there
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 4,638
- Nebulae
- 9,519
Finallytfw the moderator is actually giving hillary tough questions for once
![]()
I personally don't think we have any good choices this year. That being said I think they should have let goofy Gary into the debates.
![]()
He couldn't be any worse than Clinton.
Well here's the thing, would ya rather have an honest guy that admits he doesn't know so much about these topics or a woman who is a crony capitalist that may or may not be responsible for leaking government secrets and the deaths of many.
- doesn't know what Aleppo is
- can't name a single world leader
- freaks out over calling illegal immigrants "illegal"
let's toss up the pros and cons of all the politiciansWell here's the thing, would ya rather have an honest guy that admits he doesn't know so much about these topics or a woman who is a crony capitalist that may or may not be responsible for leaking government secrets and the deaths of many.
I admit, Gary's not the best, but he would probably be better than Clinton, and is a morally better guy thanTrump, but IDK. Just my opinion.
let's toss up the pros and cons of all the politicians
Pros
Cons
- Career politician, has connections
- Would likely keep the status quo
- Strong on social issues
- Would keep the status quo because she takes bribes from other countries
- Career politician who has connections
- Compulsive liar as proved by history
- Broke Federal laws numerous times
- Funded entirely by conflicting interests
- Wrought with scandals
Pros
Cons
- Outsider, not tied to political interests
- Self-funded and funded by small donations
- Strong on immigration and economy
- Nearly no political experience
- Wrought with scandals
- Can be single-issue
Pros
Cons
- Third-party, not influenced by party politics
- No knowledge of world events
- Small supporter base
- Flip-flops on many issues
- Entire campaign seems based on "at least I'm not the other two"
tl;dr i think that johnson is a pretty shit choice
[doublepost=1476930067][/doublepost]
http://**********/pol/1476930093684.gifdoesn't know what aleppo is
let's toss up the pros and cons of all the politicians
Pros
Cons
- Career politician, has connections
- Would likely keep the status quo
- Strong on social issues
- Would keep the status quo because she takes bribes from other countries
- Career politician who has connections
- Compulsive liar as proved by history
- Broke Federal laws numerous times
- Funded entirely by conflicting interests
- Wrought with scandals
Pros
Cons
- Outsider, not tied to political interests
- Self-funded and funded by small donations
- Strong on immigration and economy
- Nearly no political experience
- Wrought with scandals
- Can be single-issue
Pros
Cons
- Third-party, not influenced by party politics
- No knowledge of world events
- Small supporter base
- Flip-flops on many issues
- Entire campaign seems based on "at least I'm not the other two"
tl;dr i think that johnson is a pretty shit choice
[doublepost=1476930067][/doublepost]
so he'd be better than clinton, but your vote over trump is because you like his personality more?Dude, I agree, he his, but so are the rest, that's how it's always been in politics.
I won't be naive, he's not the best, nor good. I just think he'd be better than Clinton and I can't stand Trump as a person.
I just support the guy because I think he'd put us in a lot less danger as a nation.
No, I support him because he doesn't want to start unnecessary wars like Clinton and Donald do.so he'd be better than clinton, but your vote over trump is because you like his personality more?
m
fucking
f
w
although i disagree, i can respect thatNo, I support him because he doesn't want to start unnecessary wars like Clinton and Donald do.
And I like that he is socially inclusive, yet likes the free market.
(In all honesty, he isn't going to win so my opinion doesn't matter)