Akula
Sangheili Bias
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2016
- Messages
- 5,443
- Nebulae
- 19,709
yes they did its still a reason they lost the war regardless, had they actually prepared for war by building fortifications/airfields and their presence was for more than negotiation means we wouldn't of been able to attack and defeat them, but what do you expect when its a battle being fought on an island 7,800 miles away from mainland Britain compared to 1,100 miles from buenos aires.
put the british and argentinian military face to face on an even playing field where they can both utilise their air force, navy and army and the winner will without a doubt be britain. argentina simply didnt have the means of production or economy to support a full on war and had trouble projecting what military power they had beyond their mainland
You're seeming to forget that at the time the war happened the British economy was also fucked and especially their military. The British had pretty much one shot to win the war, any Argentinian victory, no matter how minor, would have sent them home due to the logistical impossibility for the UK to fund the war. And that nearly happened quite a few times, had the Argentinians sunk a few more ships the British never would have reached the Islands in the first place. It got so close at one point Thatcher wanted to nuke Buenos Aires lmao.
As for "the means of production" that doesn't really matter since they got top of the line American equipment due to their position as an American ally in the region. I really hate this narrative that the British pushed that it was a flawless victory and the Argentinian military was nothing more than a bunch of retarded conscripts, when it's pretty much blatant propaganda and false.
Reactions:
List